|
| The Primal Vow |
|
|
|
Page 2 of 3
During the 10th month of 1205 AD, the 9-point “Kofuku Temple Petition for Censure” written by Jokei (described in Part One) was sent to the Imperial Court. In the 7th article of that petition, Jokei stated that Master Honen misunderstood the Nembutsu. He argued that since Amida Buddha established 48 Vows, why consider only the 18th as the Primal Vow, and make the practice of reciting the Nembutsu (which he considered to be an inferior practice) the only practice. Further, in a work titled Zaijarin (Correcting Errors) written in 1212 AD, a monk named Koben criticized Master Honen’s Senjaku-shu which denies the Bodhisattva mind because it requires “practice.” Koben pointed out that the 19th Vow is one of the vows on which Master Honen based his teaching, and yet it contains the phrase, “arouse the Bodhisattva mind and accumulate various merits with sincerity of heart.” Such criticism, which is at least outwardly based on the sutras, takes the Path of Sages position which considers religious practices performed through “self-centered effort” to be the true Buddhist Way. The Venerable Master, however, completely denied the “various practices” position of the Path of Sages and upheld Master Honen’s position of the single practice of reciting the Nembutsu. He made that intent very clear in the Chapter on True Buddha Land of the Kyogyoshinsho, where he wrote: With regard to the ocean-like vows, there are the “true” and “provisional” vows. In other words, the Venerable Master saw that among Amida Buddha’s 48 Vows, some are “true” while others are “provisional.” He then listed the five true vows that express the “Buddha-centered power” truth:
|